Please Help: indirect tax
Posted Date : 27-Apr-2013 , 11:12:34 am | Posted By: Nitish
Category :
Excise | Answers :
0|
Comments :
1| Hits: 271
|
|
a case comes up in 2011 between USHA RECTIFIER CORPORATION V. CCE
in this case assesse imported various parts and components for testing equipments.the testing equipment was manufactured and capitivly used. assesse claimed goods are not taken out of premises.
but the decision is diffrnt according to them statemnt in balance sheet established that testing equipment was fabricated in the company and capitalized. this was also mentioned in board of director report. statement confirmed that equipment was marketable.. as per rule 9 goods are deemed to be have been removed.. hence excise duty is payble.
MY VIEW IS THA TESTING EQUIPMENT IS A CAPITAL GOOD AND IF A CAPITAL GOOD IS MANUFATURED AND CAPITIVELY USED IN THE PRIMISES IS EXEMPT FROM EXCISE DUTY...VIDE NOTIFICATION NO.67/1995~CE..... SO I DONT UNDERSTAND THE DICISION..... |
 |
|
|
|
| Comments |
| Posted By : Sanjeet |
27-Apr-2013, 02:30:42 |
| Dear Nitish, In my View notification 67/1995 is for intermediate goods, which was again used in final product and within the same factory.
In this case that was capital goods as you stated not captive goods i.e. intermediate goods also not the part of final product.
Also he also state he motive is to save import duty. I hope you well aware of that the import duty is levied for balancing the Indian duty burden. So indirectly trying to save excise duty. even duty is allowed to him as input. But first he have to pay the same. |
| |
|
|
|
|
