- All Categories
- Income Tax (1634)
- Students (770)
- Service Tax (497)
- Corporate Law (465)
- Audit (399)
- Accounts (341)
- VAT (277)
- GST (145)
- Excise (106)
- Finance (105)
- Banking (46)
- FEMA (40)
- Custom (29)
- Shares & Stock (18)
- IFRS (18)
- Income Tax Software (5)
- Cost Inflation Index (1)
Recent
- Income Tax Notice Received: What Should a Taxpayer Do?
- IN A GOVT OWENED PSU, MAKE PROVISION IN ACCOUNTS FOR ITEM HAVING CONTIGENCY IN NATURE
- GST Notice Received: How Should a Taxpayer Respond?
- CA vs CMA: Which is better?
- Can a Chartered Accountant Sign Estimated Financial Statements?
- Want to assist in Forensic Audit
- Revising 3CA 3CD to 3CB 3CD
- LFAR in Bank Branch Audit - Clause-by-Clause Discussion by CA Vivek Khurana Notes required
- Bank Branch Audit
- Got high refund
- Form 67
- GSTR9
- Partner of CA firm required
- RENEWAL OF REGISTRATION
- financial statements
- income Tax
- ITR Filing
- Property Attachement
- Liability of Independent and Non-executive director
- financial statements
- stock statement procedure for bank od loan
- ITR FILING OF ARMY UNIT
- signing of Project report
- NON CORPORATE BALANCE SHEET FORMAT
- CA FINAL
- Accounting Treatment of Mutual Fund under IndAS
- ITC Availed & Utilized on Supply from Non-Existent Firms
- GST Liability of Award received by a Company
- Reund of TDS Excess Deposited
- Income Tax TDS
- gst
- Reconstitution of partnership firm in case of death of partner and introduction of new partner
- Consolidattion of financial statemement
- PAYMENT TO OPEN AI AND ENVATO ELEMENT
- NR GST NUMBER
- Presumptive Income
- tax audit late filing penality provision applicable f.y.23-24
- Interest in outstanding demand
- sale turnover declared as per books or AIS show in itr f.y.23-24
- GST
Q. > Please Help: GSTR9
I seek your kind guidance on an issue encountered while filing Form GSTR-9, relating to excess GST paid and subsequently adjusted through GSTR-3B.
Brief facts of the case are as under:
While filing GSTR-3B for August 2023, the client manually reported the following figures based on Excel workings:
Outward Supply: ?15,25,368
CGST: ?1,52,000.68 (should have been 9% of outward supply i.e. 137283 excess tax of Rs. 14717 mistakenly reported and paid)
SGST: ?1,52,000.68 (should have been 9% of outward supply i.e. 137283 excess tax of Rs. 14717 mistakenly reported and paid)
The above excess tax reporting occurred due to incorrect formulas and calculation errors in the Excel working sheet, and the figures were inadvertently reported in GSTR-3B.
During annual reconciliation, it was observed that the entire outward supply was taxable at 18% GST only. Accordingly, the correct tax liability should have been:
CGST @9%: ?1,37,283
SGST @9%: ?1,37,283
Thus, excess tax of ?14,717 CGST and ?14,717 SGST was reported and paid in August 2023.
To rectify the same, the GST liability in GSTR-3B for August 2024 was manually reduced by:
CGST: ?14,717
SGST: ?14,717
While filing GSTR-9 for FY 2024-25, the utility reflects an additional tax liability of ?29,434 (?14,717 CGST + ?14,717 SGST).
It may kindly be noted that the client was not liable to file GSTR-9 for FY 2023-24, hence no annual return was filed for that year.
Query:
In view of the above facts, we request your guidance on the following:
How should the excess tax paid in FY 2023-24 due to incorrect Excel calculations and subsequently adjusted in FY 2024-25 be reported in GSTR-9 for FY 2024-25?
In which table of GSTR-9 should such adjustment be disclosed to ensure correct reconciliation and to avoid duplication of tax liability?
Your expert guidance on this matter will be highly appreciated.
CA Sansaar

Comments
Hitesh Jain
28-Feb-2026 , 03:28:35 pmIn the given case, excess tax was actually paid in August 2023 (FY 2023-24) and later adjusted in August 2024 (FY 2024-25) through reduction in GSTR-3B. The key point is that GSTR-9 is a summary of transactions already reported in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for that financial year, and it does not permit fresh adjustments. For FY 2024-25, GSTR-9 should reflect the figures exactly as reported in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B of that year. Since the liability was reduced in August 2024 through 3B, the impact will automatically flow into Table 9 (tax paid) of GSTR-9 for FY 2024-25. There is no separate table in GSTR-9 meant for reporting “prior year excess tax adjustment”. However, from a legal perspective, adjustment of excess tax of one financial year in the next year should ideally be done within the time limits prescribed under Section 16/39 and supported by proper workings. If the portal utility is showing additional liability, reconcile Table 4 (outward supplies) with Table 9 (tax paid) carefully and ensure that the turnover of FY 2024-25 does not include FY 2023-24 figures. Maintain detailed reconciliation working papers in case of departmental scrutiny.