- All Categories
- Income Tax (1633)
- Students (770)
- Service Tax (497)
- Corporate Law (465)
- Audit (399)
- Accounts (340)
- VAT (277)
- GST (145)
- Excise (106)
- Finance (105)
- Banking (46)
- FEMA (40)
- Custom (29)
- Shares & Stock (18)
- IFRS (18)
- Income Tax Software (5)
- Cost Inflation Index (1)
Recent
- GST Notice Received: How Should a Taxpayer Respond?
- CA vs CMA: Which is better?
- Can a Chartered Accountant Sign Estimated Financial Statements?
- Want to assist in Forensic Audit
- Revising 3CA 3CD to 3CB 3CD
- LFAR in Bank Branch Audit - Clause-by-Clause Discussion by CA Vivek Khurana Notes required
- Bank Branch Audit
- Got high refund
- Form 67
- GSTR9
- Partner of CA firm required
- RENEWAL OF REGISTRATION
- financial statements
- income Tax
- ITR Filing
- Property Attachement
- Liability of Independent and Non-executive director
- financial statements
- stock statement procedure for bank od loan
- ITR FILING OF ARMY UNIT
- signing of Project report
- NON CORPORATE BALANCE SHEET FORMAT
- CA FINAL
- Accounting Treatment of Mutual Fund under IndAS
- ITC Availed & Utilized on Supply from Non-Existent Firms
- GST Liability of Award received by a Company
- Reund of TDS Excess Deposited
- Income Tax TDS
- gst
- Reconstitution of partnership firm in case of death of partner and introduction of new partner
- Consolidattion of financial statemement
- PAYMENT TO OPEN AI AND ENVATO ELEMENT
- NR GST NUMBER
- Presumptive Income
- tax audit late filing penality provision applicable f.y.23-24
- Interest in outstanding demand
- sale turnover declared as per books or AIS show in itr f.y.23-24
- GST
- tax audit or normal itr filed f.y. 23-24
- PF Withdrawal and ITR
Q. > Please Help: CAPITAL GAIN
In a case, assessee purchased an immovable property in year 2005 from RFC (Rajasthan Finance Corporation) which was duly registered with name of the assessee and possession obtained but RFC allowed payment of consideration over next 5 years i.e. 2010 alongwith interest thereon.
The assessing officer wants to take date of acquisition 2010 i.e. when the last installment was paid not 2005 on which property was purchased.
Pl. comment on the above i.e. is the assessing officer correct? And also quote relevant case studies.
CA Sansaar

Comments
maneesh
08-Dec-2016 , 12:37:32 pmACTUAL DATE OF POSSESSION IS 2005
CA Puran Luthra
26-Dec-2016 , 04:10:50 pmIn case registration deed is of 2005 then date of acquisition will be 2005 itself. AO can't take the date of acquisition as 2010. seller has just allowed the payment in installments with interest, then it is just like finance (loan) which could have been taken from any body.