- All Categories
- Income Tax (1633)
- Students (770)
- Service Tax (497)
- Corporate Law (465)
- Audit (399)
- Accounts (340)
- VAT (277)
- GST (145)
- Excise (106)
- Finance (105)
- Banking (46)
- FEMA (40)
- Custom (29)
- Shares & Stock (18)
- IFRS (18)
- Income Tax Software (5)
- Cost Inflation Index (1)
Recent
- GST Notice Received: How Should a Taxpayer Respond?
- CA vs CMA: Which is better?
- Can a Chartered Accountant Sign Estimated Financial Statements?
- Want to assist in Forensic Audit
- Revising 3CA 3CD to 3CB 3CD
- LFAR in Bank Branch Audit - Clause-by-Clause Discussion by CA Vivek Khurana Notes required
- Bank Branch Audit
- Got high refund
- Form 67
- GSTR9
- Partner of CA firm required
- RENEWAL OF REGISTRATION
- financial statements
- income Tax
- ITR Filing
- Property Attachement
- Liability of Independent and Non-executive director
- financial statements
- stock statement procedure for bank od loan
- ITR FILING OF ARMY UNIT
- signing of Project report
- NON CORPORATE BALANCE SHEET FORMAT
- CA FINAL
- Accounting Treatment of Mutual Fund under IndAS
- ITC Availed & Utilized on Supply from Non-Existent Firms
- GST Liability of Award received by a Company
- Reund of TDS Excess Deposited
- Income Tax TDS
- gst
- Reconstitution of partnership firm in case of death of partner and introduction of new partner
- Consolidattion of financial statemement
- PAYMENT TO OPEN AI AND ENVATO ELEMENT
- NR GST NUMBER
- Presumptive Income
- tax audit late filing penality provision applicable f.y.23-24
- Interest in outstanding demand
- sale turnover declared as per books or AIS show in itr f.y.23-24
- GST
- tax audit or normal itr filed f.y. 23-24
- PF Withdrawal and ITR
4894
QUESTIONS
4699
ANSWERS
833
EXPERTS
2729
QUERIST
CA Sansaar

Comments
Piyush Laddha
10-Jan-2015 , 06:58:20 pmNo, It will not come under the perview of Section 40 A(3) because the company has not paid any payment, it is advance only and voucher of employee will be also in part only.
Y.K.Bhushan
14-Jan-2015 , 10:12:14 amNo in fact it is not a expense , it is an advance only
m r gopal
14-Jan-2015 , 11:52:00 amsince this is only an advance and has not crystalised into expenditure provision of sec 40(a)(3) may not be attracted
Ashish Jain
14-Jan-2015 , 03:52:53 pmNo, it is not in nature of expense
ashish shah
14-Jan-2015 , 06:23:56 pmit will result in book adjustment and finally expense will be debited which is exception as mentioned in rule 6DD(d).
Neeraj Trivedi
14-Jan-2015 , 08:10:31 pmTake Tour advance as Short term advances and when actual expense is known put the expenses entry in pl and cancel the advance with it...and by doing this sec-40a3 would not be affected as the expenditure is not charge to pl
Neeraj Trivedi
14-Jan-2015 , 08:16:07 pmthe last line i want to amend.. and by doing this sec-40a3 would not be affected as the advance not yet charged to pl..
Geetika Mittal
12-Feb-2015 , 07:17:31 amThanks everyone for your clear and valued comments..